In the Path of Grace (Pustimarg), renunciation is not about leaving behind material possessions or retreating from worldly responsibilities. Instead, it is about letting go of ego and dedicating oneself wholeheartedly to Shri Krishna. Shri Vallabhacharya teaches that true renunciation is an inner transformation that fosters divine love and devotion. By living with detachment and performing one’s duties with faith, one can align their actions with spiritual progress. The Pustimarg emphasizes that surrendering to divine grace does not require drastic changes to one’s lifestyle, but rather a steadfast focus on devotion and a balance of worldly and spiritual pursuits. This approach dissolves doubts about what to renounce and redirects everything towards attaining the divine.

These verses explore into the spiritual significance of renunciation and devotion.

  1. Renunciation as a Path: Renunciation, when practiced thoughtfully, helps remove repentance and regret. It finds importance especially in the paths of devotion (bhakti) and knowledge (jnana).

  2. Prioritizing Devotion: In the age of Kali (Kali Yuga), where disturbances are prevalent, the path of devotion is given precedence over the path of karma.

  3. Association and Protection: Spiritual progress is supported by association with like-minded individuals and protecting one’s devotional practices.

  4. Obstacles in Devotion: Household life and attachment to sensory objects can become obstacles in one’s devotional journey, but steadfastness in faith prevails.

  5. Divine Separation and Bliss: Experiencing separation from the Lord and detaching from worldly bonds brings an unparalleled spiritual fulfillment.

  6. Role of Gurus and Exemplars: Exemplars like Kaundinya and the Gopis embody the path of surrender, where faith and contemplation perfect one’s sentiments.

  7. Divine Grace and Guidance: Shri Krishna’s grace (puṣṭi) is central to removing obstacles, and surrendering to the Guru’s instructions ensures one stays on the right path.

The granth ultimately emphasizes the essence of full surrender to the Lord in order to achieve peace, overcome obstacles, and align with one’s true purpose.


Renunciation (parityāgaḥ) is contemplated as a means to remove repentance and regret (paścāttāpa nivṛtti-arthaṁ). It is said to belong to two paths (sa mārga-dvitaye proktaḥ), with particular importance in devotion (bhaktau) and knowledge (jñāne viśeṣataḥ), emphasizing its role in spiritual liberation and progress.

In the age of Kali (kali-kālataḥ), the path of karma, or ritualistic action (karma-mārge), is not considered effective (na kartavyaḥ) due to the complexities and disturbances of this age (sutarāṁ). Therefore (ata), priority is given to the path of devotion (ādau bhakti-mārge), as it is regarded as the most suitable and essential path (kartavya-tvāt-vicāraṇā) for spiritual progress in this era.

For the accomplishment of prominence in hearing and other devotional practices (śravaṇa-ādi-prasiddhi-arthaṁ), if certain duties are not undertaken (kartavyaḥ cet sa neṣyate), it is due to the necessity of association with helpers (sahāya-saṅga-sādhya-tvāt) and the safeguarding of the means of spiritual practices (sādhanānāṁ ca rakṣaṇāt). This highlights the importance of community and protection in sustaining one's spiritual journey.

Due to pride (abhimāna-āt), commands (niyogāt ca), and opposition to prescribed duties (tad-dharmaiḥ ca virodhataḥ), if household life and its attachments (gṛhādeḥ) become obstacles (bādhakatvena) to spiritual practices (sādhana-artham), then so it is deemed (tathā yadi). This verse emphasizes the need to overcome such barriers for the pursuit of spiritual progress.

Even in the future (agre api), association with such individuals as described (tādṛśaiḥ eva saṅgaḥ) will be possible but not otherwise (na anyathā). If one becomes overwhelmed by sensory objects (svayaṁ ca viṣaya-ākrāntaḥ), they may eventually fall into heresy (pāṣaṇḍī syāt tu kālataḥ), emphasizing the dangers of losing focus on spiritual goals due to worldly distractions.

For those whose bodies are overwhelmed by sensory objects (viṣaya-ākrānta-dehānāṁ), the presence of the Lord (āveśaḥ hareḥ) does not always remain constant (na āveśaḥ sarvadā). Therefore (ataḥ), in the realm of devotion (atra sādhane bhaktau), renunciation (tyāgaḥ) does not necessarily lead to happiness (na eva sukhāvahaḥ), emphasizing the need for balance in spiritual practice rather than withdrawal.

Renunciation (parityāgaḥ) is highly praised (praśasyate) as a means for experiencing the profound state of divine separation (viraha-anubhava-arthaṁ tu) from the Lord. It is also valued for its role in detaching from personal bonds (svīya-bandha-nivṛtti-arthaṁ). This state of renunciation (veśaḥ saḥ) is deemed appropriate in this context (atra) and not otherwise (na ca anyathā), emphasizing its transformative purpose in spiritual growth.

The exemplars such as Kauṇḍinya and the Gopīs (kauṇḍinyaḥ gopikāḥ proktāḥ) are acknowledged as Gurus (guravaḥ) and embody the essence of spiritual practice (sādhanaṁ ca tat). Their profound sentiments (bhāvaḥ) are perfected through contemplative meditation (bhāvanayā siddhaḥ), and no other means (sādhanaṁ na anyat iṣyate) is prescribed for attaining spiritual realization, highlighting the supremacy of heartfelt devotion and contemplation.

Weakness (vikalatvaṁ) and lack of assurance (asvāsyaṁ), along with worldly nature (prakṛtiḥ prākṛtaṁ), do not pertain to the divine (na hi). However, knowledge (jñānaṁ) and attributes (guṇāḥ) of the Lord, in their ultimate nature, may appear as obstacles (bādhakāḥ) for a practitioner existing in this worldly state (tasya evaṁ vartamānasya). This emphasizes the importance of transcending material limitations to fully align with spiritual truth.

In the realm of truth (satya-loke), existence is sustained by knowledge (sthitiḥ jñānāt) that is refined through renunciation (saṁnyāsena viśeṣitāt). Where contemplation serves as the means (bhāvanā sādhanaṁ yatra), the desired result (phalaṁ ca api) is naturally achieved in alignment with this practice (tathā bhavet). This emphasizes the transformative power of renunciation and meditation in attaining spiritual fulfillment.

Such beings, who embody divine qualities (tādṛśāḥ), certainly reside at the very beginning of the realm of truth, Satyaloka (satya-loka-ādau tiṣṭhanti eva na sanśayaḥ), with no doubt of their presence. If the self manifests outwardly (bahiḥ cet prakaṭaḥ svātmā), it might enter like fire (vahnivat praviśet yadi), symbolizing the powerful and transformative nature of their spiritual essence.

Only at that moment (tadaiva), all bonds (sakala-bandho) are destroyed (nāśam eti), and not otherwise (na ca anyathā). Attributes or qualities (guṇāḥ), when free from attachment (saṅga-rāhityāt), exist solely for the purpose of sustaining life (jīvana-artham bhavanti hi). This verse highlights the transformative power of detachment and the purity of qualities when untainted by worldly associations.

The Lord, being the embodiment of the ultimate results (bhagavān phala-rūpatvāt), is not considered an obstacle in this context (na atra bādhaka iṣyate). Statements regarding personal well-being or health (svāsthya-vākyaṁ) are unnecessary and should not be made (na kartavyaṁ), as the compassionate one, the Lord (dayāluḥ), does not oppose or hinder (na virudhyate). This verse emphasizes the Lord's gracious and supportive role in all spiritual endeavors.

This rare renunciation (durlabhaḥ ayaṁ parityāgaḥ) can only be accomplished through divine love (premṇā sidhyati) and not by any other means (na anyathā). In the path of knowledge (jñāna-mārge), renunciation is considered in two distinct forms (dvividhaḥ api vicāritaḥ), emphasizing its nuanced and profound role in spiritual progress.

For the attainment of knowledge (jñāna-artham), the subsequent stage of progress (uttarāṅgaṁ ca) is perfection (siddhiḥ), which is achieved only after countless births (janma-śataiḥ param). Knowledge (jñānaṁ) is considered to be dependent on spiritual means (sādhana-apekṣaṁ), such as listening to sacred sacrifices (yajñādi-śravaṇāt matam), emphasizing the importance of dedicated practice and effort in the pursuit of wisdom.

Therefore (ataḥ), in this age of Kali (kalau), such renunciation (sa saṁnyāsaḥ) leads to repentance and regret (paścāttāpa-āya) and not otherwise (na anyathā). It may even give rise to heresy (pāṣaṇḍitvaṁ bhavet ca api). Hence, one should not embrace renunciation (tasmāt jñāne na saṁnyaset) in the pursuit of knowledge, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful consideration in spiritual practices during this era.

Due to the overpowering nature of the faults of Kali Yuga (sutarāṁ kali-doṣāṇāṁ prabala-tvāt), this becomes the prevailing situation (iti sthitiḥ). Even if flaws arise in the path of devotion (bhakti-mārge api cet doṣaḥ), the question arises—what action should be taken (tadā kiṁ kāryam ucyate)? This verse emphasizes the challenges in maintaining spiritual focus amidst the disturbances of the Kali era and invites contemplation on the appropriate response to such obstacles.

In this context (atra), at the beginning of the endeavor (ārambhe), destruction or failure (na nāśaḥ syāt) will not occur due to the lack of precedent or example (dṛṣṭānta-asya api abhāvataḥ). If renunciation is undertaken for the sake of peace or well-being (svāsthya-hetoḥ parityāgāt), then (asya) what obstacle (bādhaḥ kena) can possibly arise (sambhavet)? This verse highlights the assurance of success when actions are rooted in sincere intention and peaceful purpose.

Here, Hari (hariḥ) cannot cause an obstacle (na śaknoti kartuṁ bādhāṁ), so how could others (kuto apare)? Just as mothers (mātaraḥ) never nourish their children (bālān) without milk (na stanyaiḥ pupuṣuḥ kvacit), the divine presence of Hari is essential and free of hindrance, emphasizing His supportive and nurturing role in spiritual progress.

Even through the words of the wise (jñāninām api vākyena), a devotee (bhaktaṁ) cannot be deluded or confused (na mohayiṣyati). The one who bestows the self (ātma-pradaḥ) and is beloved (priyaḥ ca api) would not create delusion (kim-arthaṁ mohayiṣyati). This verse underscores the unwavering connection between the Lord and His devotees, highlighting His role as a compassionate guide who only strengthens their devotion.

Therefore (tasmāt), renunciation (parityāgaḥ) should be prescribed and practiced in the manner described (ukta-prakāreṇa vidhīyatām). Otherwise (anyathā), one will deviate (bhraśyate) from their true purpose (sva-arthāt). This is my firm conviction (iti me niścitā matiḥ). This verse highlights the necessity of thoughtful and prescribed renunciation to stay aligned with one's spiritual goal.

Thus (iti), with the grace of Krishna (kṛṣṇa-prasādena), Vallabha (vallabhena) has firmly determined (viniścitam) the importance of renunciation in devotion (saṁnyāsa-varaṇaṁ bhaktau). Without such renunciation (anyathā), one would inevitably fall (patito bhavet) from their spiritual path. This verse underscores the essential role of surrender and renunciation in the pursuit of divine love and unwavering devotion.


Thus ends the 'Bāla-bodha' composed by Shri Vallabhacharya.